Skip to content

Effects & Impacts: Feedback effects

Image: Michael Held

Other sections

Home > Climate wiki > Effects > Feedback effects

Feedback effects: fire & ice

/ Return to ‘Impacts‘ menu

Summary

We find that the magnitude of the (Canadian wildfire) carbon emissions is 647 TgC (570–727 TgC), comparable to the annual fossil fuel emissions of large nations, with only India, China and the USA releasing more carbon per year – Brynes et al, 2024

  • Both trigger cascading positive feedbacks in other earth systems. Both examples are explained in more detail on this page.

Native terrestrial biodiversity in Canterbury was deemed to be at major risk due to drought, increased fire weather and reduced snow and ice. Climate-induced impacts on biodiversity are highly uncertain, but terrestrial biological and ecological impacts could have flow-on impacts to the food system (Landcare, 2019). – Tonkin & Taylor 2020

…fire size persistently amplified decade-long postfire land surface warming in summer per unit burnt area. Both warming and its amplification with fire size were found to diminish with an increasing abundance of broadleaf trees, consistent with their lower fire vulnerability compared with coniferous species.Chao Yue et al 2024

Combining the extreme thermal sensitivities with projected increases in maximum temperatures globally, we predict that moderate warming scenarios can increase heat failure rates by 774% (terrestrial) and 180% (aquatic) by 2100. This finding suggests that we are likely to underestimate the potential impact of even a modest global warming scenario.Jørgensen et al, 2022

Other sections

Home > Climate wiki > Effects > Feedback effects

Summary

We find that the magnitude of the (Canadian wildfire) carbon emissions is 647 TgC (570–727 TgC), comparable to the annual fossil fuel emissions of large nations, with only India, China and the USA releasing more carbon per year – Brynes et al, 2024

  • Both trigger cascading positive feedbacks in other earth systems. Both examples are explained in more detail on this page.

Native terrestrial biodiversity in Canterbury was deemed to be at major risk due to drought, increased fire weather and reduced snow and ice. Climate-induced impacts on biodiversity are highly uncertain, but terrestrial biological and ecological impacts could have flow-on impacts to the food system (Landcare, 2019). – Tonkin & Taylor 2020

…fire size persistently amplified decade-long postfire land surface warming in summer per unit burnt area. Both warming and its amplification with fire size were found to diminish with an increasing abundance of broadleaf trees, consistent with their lower fire vulnerability compared with coniferous species.Chao Yue et al 2024

Combining the extreme thermal sensitivities with projected increases in maximum temperatures globally, we predict that moderate warming scenarios can increase heat failure rates by 774% (terrestrial) and 180% (aquatic) by 2100. This finding suggests that we are likely to underestimate the potential impact of even a modest global warming scenario.Jørgensen et al, 2022

Example #1: the Albedo Effect—ice and snow

Clean ice and snow have a very high albedo, that is, they reflect up to 90% of solar radiation back into space. Water is much darker, so it has a very low albedo, reflecting only about 6% of the incoming solar radiation and absorbing the other 94%, warming it (Fig. 1).

Warming over the past 40 years has led to a very large decrease in the  amount of summer sea ice in the Arctic (Video 1). It’s not just the total area of cover that’s decline, it’s also the thickness of the ice, so the total volume of sea ice in the Arctic has declined 95% in the past 33 years. In Greenland, high altitude ice sheets are starting to melt. That lowers the altitude of the ice, which exposes it to more heating. The dark lakes that form on the ice absorb heat due to the Albedo effect, leading it even more warming, and so on.

Video 1: Loss of sea ice in the Arctic is creating a positive feedback effect, leading to more warming.

Fig. 1: The Albedo Effect over snow and ice versus water. (Image: NASA)
Fig. 1: The Albedo Effect over snow and ice versus water. (Image: NASA)
This loss means more heat-absorbing open ocean is exposed (as ice thins, it has a progressively lower albedo), leading to more warming, and so on every year in a downward spiral.

This triggers a cascading series of feedbacks that affects weather, changes how ocean currents work, and melts permafrost and methane clathrates, which is releasing more of the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere. This in turn leads to even more warming, which in turn melts more ice, in a positive feedback loop.

In Greenland, high altitude ice sheets are starting to melt. That lowers the altitude of the ice, which exposes it to more heating. The dark lakes that form on the ice absorb heat due to the Albedo effect, leading it even more warming, and so on.
 

The overall result is that warming in the Arctic is warming 4 times faster than the global average (over the Barents Sea as much as 7 times faster) (Fig. 2), which continues to enhance the positive (warming) feedback loop.

Fig. 2: The Arctic is warming twice as fast on average as elsewhere. (Image: NASA)
Fig. 2: The Arctic is warming twice as fast on average as elsewhere. (Image: NASA)

Example # 2: wildfires

As the climate warms, evaporation dries out vegetation, making it more prone to fires. This triggers a range of positive (warming) feedback effects, depending on where the fires are located. One feedback is the explosive growth of forest fires globally, in areas that have rarely experienced them. Fires are becoming so large entire ecosystems are being destroyed, unable to recover because temperatures are now too high to support their recovery. 

Research is now underway; contact Tim Curran (Lincoln University) or Phil Novis (Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research) for more information.

To fully explore this global problem, see ‘How climate change is affecting wildfires around the world’ (Carbon Brief).

Fig 3: Smoke plumes from bushfires in southeast Australia on January 4, 2020, sent ash over New Zealand. (Image: NASA Earth Observatory)

Wildfires in Australia impact Aoteaora

Until 2019, Australia’s national fire-related carbon emissions averaged 439 million tonnes/year. In the first 6 weeks of 2020 alone, fires emitted 830 million tonnes

The effects were felt here in New Zealand when ash and smoke blew across the Tasman (Fig. 3). One afternoon our skies turned orange and for the next few weeks, ash fell over already retreating glaciers, reducing their albedo, leading to faster melting (Fig. 4).

It also extended the hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica.

As the climate warms, the weather system in the Indian Ocean, the Indian Dipole (the Pacific ‘sister’ of El Niño/La Niña) is expected see more strong “positive” events similar to the one seen in 2019 that contributed to the Australian drought and bushfires.

Fig 4: Ash landed on Franz Josef glacier. The albedo effect increases the melt rate of snow and ice on New Zealand’s glaciers. This in turn has a feedback effect by changing river flows and water storage. (Image: Twitter/ @Rachelhatesit)

Wildfires in the Arctic

“As we move into the 2020 Boreal and Arctic wildfire season in the Northern Hemisphere, parts of the Arctic Circle have been more than ten degrees warmer than usual over the last couple of weeks.”  Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service, May 2020

Wildfires that incinerated tundra along the Arctic Circle this summer released a record 244 million tonnes of carbon dioxide—35% more than last year, which was also a record breaker.” Nature, September 2020

According to the latest public records, the Canadian wildfires of 2023 have razed 18.5 million hectares of land to date – nearly triple the previous record. They released [an estimated) 2.4 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide. To put that into perspective, it’s three and a half times the annual emissions for all of Canada’s economy.” Radio NZ Jan. 2024

Fig. 5: Carbon emissions from Canadian wildfires by August 2023; the fires continued to burn.
Fig. 5: Carbon emissions from Canadian wildfires by August 2023; the fires continued to burn.

“The entire Canadian Boreal contains 307 billion tonnes  of carbon…as much carbon as the world emits in 36 years.”  – Anthony Swift, Natural Resources Defense Council, Canada

“Climate warming and drying has led to more severe and frequent forest fires, which threaten to shift the carbon balance of the boreal ecosystem from net accumulation to net loss, resulting in a positive climate feedback… This implies a shift to a domain of carbon cycling in which these forests become a net source—instead of a sink—of carbon to the atmosphere over consecutive fires.”  Walker et al, 2019

Every year, the wildfire season in the Northern Hemisphere (Alaska, Canada, and Russia) begins earlier, ends later, and is more intense. The June 2021 heatwave in the Pacific Northwest generated a record number of wildfires. 

One feedback effect is that the soot or ‘black carbon‘ that falls on ice as far away as Greenland (Fig. 6) reduces the albedo and enhances surface melting, which in turn speeds up the disintegration of outlet glaciers that hold back the massive Greenland ice sheet leading to increasing meltwater that increases the speed of rising sea levels. Large volumes of freshwater melting is also changing the ocean currents with multiple profound effects around the globe.

Fig 6: Meltwater lakes and dark snow dramatically reduces albedo so heat is absorbed promoting more melting. (Image: Kintisch Greenland).

In addition to losing forest, fires in boreal regions are threatening to turn peat, which had once been a carbon sink, into a major source of atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide. The peat in this region is largely permafrost, but that’s now melting at an alarming rate, both from atmospheric warming and from increasingly uncontrollable forest fires melting the upper layers of the soil (Video 2).

Video 2: As Arctic summers get warmer and drier, boreal forest fires are becoming more intense, meaning they burn deeper into the soil. (NASA)